Skip to content

RS 7.22.2 June maintenance release notes#3494

Open
rrelledge wants to merge 3 commits into
mainfrom
DOC-6690
Open

RS 7.22.2 June maintenance release notes#3494
rrelledge wants to merge 3 commits into
mainfrom
DOC-6690

Conversation

@rrelledge

@rrelledge rrelledge commented Jun 12, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Note

Low Risk
Documentation-only addition with no application or infrastructure code changes; main review note is accuracy of RS188659/UNWATCH wording and filling SHA256 values before publish.

Overview
Adds a new Hugo release-notes page at rs-7-22-2-tba.md for the 7.22.2-tba (June 2026) Redis Software maintenance build, following the same structure as the existing 7.22.2 patch notes (e.g. rs-7-22-2-116.md).

The page documents release-specific content: highlights and RS188659 (IPv6 addresses containing ::1 no longer misclassified as loopback, fixing node join failures), a proxy enhancement that skips forwarding UNWATCH to shards when the client has no active WATCH, and the usual module/OSS version tables (7.4.3, 7.2.7, 6.2.13). The Downloads SHA256 table is present but left empty (TBA). Known issues, limitations, and the long open-source Redis security/CVE collapsible sections are included for this version label.

Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 8b33d9e. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.

@rrelledge rrelledge requested review from a team and shreyaverma-git June 12, 2026 21:40
@rrelledge rrelledge self-assigned this Jun 12, 2026
@rrelledge rrelledge added do not merge yet rs Redis Software labels Jun 12, 2026
@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Jun 12, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

DOC-6690

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@jit-ci

jit-ci Bot commented Jun 12, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🛡️ Jit Security Scan Results

CRITICAL HIGH MEDIUM

✅ No security findings were detected in this PR


Security scan by Jit

@andy-stark-redis andy-stark-redis left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants